|
G-PA-03
Sept 2, 2011 20:39:03 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:39:03 GMT -5
In hemodynamically unstable dogs and cats with ROSC after CPA, a hemodynamic optimization strategy that includes primary resuscitation endpoints of central venous O2 saturation or lactate, and secondary endpoints including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, PCV and arterial oxygen saturation may be considered.
|
|
|
G-PA-02
Sept 2, 2011 20:38:43 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:38:43 GMT -5
IV fluids should be avoided in dogs and cats post-arrest with evidence of congestive heart failure.
|
|
|
G-PA-01
Sept 2, 2011 20:35:20 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:35:20 GMT -5
The routine use of large volumes of intraveous fluid post-arrest is not recommended except in the case of strongly suspected or confirmed hypovolemia.
|
|
|
PA20
Sept 2, 2011 20:33:33 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:33:33 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does post-CPR care in a specialty center (I) compared to post-CPR care in a non-specialty center (C) provide better outcomes (O) (e.g. survival rates or neurologic outcomes)?
|
|
|
PA19
Sept 2, 2011 20:33:11 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:33:11 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest, does the use of a comprehensive treatment protocol, as opposed to standard care, improve outcome (eg, survival)?
|
|
|
PA18
Sept 2, 2011 20:32:56 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:32:56 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does maintaining a pH goal with buffers (e.g. NaHCO3) (I) compared to no pH control (C), result in improved outcome (O) (survival to discharge neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA17
Sept 2, 2011 20:32:37 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:32:37 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the use of metabolic protectants (Ethyl pyruvate; PARP, mitochondrial protectants) (I) as opposed to standard care (C) improve outcome (e.g. survival with good neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA16
Sept 2, 2011 20:32:23 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:32:23 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the use of neuroprotective drugs (I) as opposed to standard care (C) improve outcome (e.g. survival with good neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA15
Sept 2, 2011 20:32:07 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:32:07 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the administration of mannitol / hypertonic saline (I) compared to standard care (C), result in improved outcome (O) (survival to discharge; neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA14
Sept 2, 2011 20:31:48 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:31:48 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC (P), does seizure prophylaxis (I) compared to standard care (C), result in improved outcome (O) (decreased seizures, survival to discharge neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA13
Sept 2, 2011 20:31:35 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:31:35 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the administration of corticosteroids (I) compared to standard care (C), result in improved outcome (O) (survival to discharge neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA11
Sept 2, 2011 20:31:12 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:31:12 GMT -5
In dogs and cats that remain comatose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (P) does a specific onset, level and duration of therapeutic hypothermia (I) compared to normothermia (C) improve outcome (O) (neurological intact survival)?
|
|
|
PA10
Sept 2, 2011 20:30:42 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:30:42 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does rewarming at a certain rate (C/hour) (I) compared to fast rewarming to normal temperature (C) improve outcome (O) (neurological intact survival)?
|
|
|
PA08
Sept 2, 2011 20:30:28 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:30:28 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the administration of 100% oxygen (I) compared to titration to normoxia (e.g. to SpO2 > 94%) (C), result in improved outcome (O) (survival to discharge neurological function)?
|
|
|
PA07
Sept 2, 2011 20:30:07 GMT -5
Post by Dan Fletcher on Sept 2, 2011 20:30:07 GMT -5
In dogs and cats with ROSC after cardiac arrest (P), does the routine use of positive pressure ventilation, or a specific ventilation strategy (I) as opposed to standard care (periodic checking for spontaneous respiration and allowing the animal to ventilate itself) (C), improve outcome (O) (e.g. survival)?
|
|